Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, z, k, l]
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
MINUS(minus(x, y), z) -> MINUS(x, plus(y, z))
MINUS(minus(x, y), z) -> PLUS(y, z)
QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))
QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)
APP(cons(x, l), k) -> APP(l, k)
SUM(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> SUM(cons(plus(x, y), l))
SUM(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> PLUS(x, y)
SUM(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))
SUM(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> APP(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k))))
SUM(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> SUM(cons(x, cons(y, k)))

Furthermore, R contains six SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

PLUS(s(s(x'')), y'') -> PLUS(s(x''), y'')

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(s(x'')), y'') -> PLUS(s(x''), y'')

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

PLUS(s(s(x'')), y'') -> PLUS(s(x''), y'')

one new Dependency Pair is created:

PLUS(s(s(s(x''''))), y'''') -> PLUS(s(s(x'''')), y'''')

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 8

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(s(s(x''''))), y'''') -> PLUS(s(s(x'''')), y'''')

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

PLUS(s(s(s(x''''))), y'''') -> PLUS(s(s(x'''')), y'''')

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 9

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

APP(cons(x, l), k) -> APP(l, k)

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APP(cons(x, l), k) -> APP(l, k)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

APP(cons(x, cons(x'', l'')), k'') -> APP(cons(x'', l''), k'')

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

APP(cons(x, cons(x'', l'')), k'') -> APP(cons(x'', l''), k'')

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

APP(cons(x, cons(x'', l'')), k'') -> APP(cons(x'', l''), k'')

one new Dependency Pair is created:

APP(cons(x, cons(x'''', cons(x''''', l''''))), k'''') -> APP(cons(x'''', cons(x''''', l'''')), k'''')

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 11

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

APP(cons(x, cons(x'''', cons(x''''', l''''))), k'''') -> APP(cons(x'''', cons(x''''', l'''')), k'''')

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

APP(cons(x, cons(x'''', cons(x''''', l''''))), k'''') -> APP(cons(x'''', cons(x''''', l'''')), k'''')

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂

POL(APP(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 10

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 12

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pairs:

MINUS(minus(x, y), z) -> MINUS(x, plus(y, z))
MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MINUS(minus(x, y), z) -> MINUS(x, plus(y, z))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

MINUS(minus(x, s(x'')), z') -> MINUS(x, s(plus(x'', z')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 13

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 13

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 14

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 13

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 15

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 13

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 16

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

SUM(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> SUM(cons(plus(x, y), l))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

SUM(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> SUM(cons(plus(x, y), l))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 0

POL(0) = 0

POL(SUM(x₁)) = x₁

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂

POL(s(x₁)) = 0

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

           →DP Problem 17

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))
QUOT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> QUOT(minus(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))
QUOT(s(minus(x'', y'')), s(y0)) -> QUOT(minus(x'', plus(y'', y0)), s(y0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 18

             ↳Narrowing Transformation

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pairs:

QUOT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> QUOT(minus(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))
QUOT(s(minus(x'', y'')), s(y0)) -> QUOT(minus(x'', plus(y'', y0)), s(y0))
QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUOT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> QUOT(minus(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))

three new Dependency Pairs are created:

QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))
QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))
QUOT(s(s(minus(x', y'))), s(s(y'''))) -> QUOT(minus(x', plus(y', y''')), s(s(y''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 18

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 19

                 ↳Narrowing Transformation

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pairs:

QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))
QUOT(s(s(minus(x', y'))), s(s(y'''))) -> QUOT(minus(x', plus(y', y''')), s(s(y''')))
QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))
QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))
QUOT(s(minus(x'', y'')), s(y0)) -> QUOT(minus(x'', plus(y'', y0)), s(y0))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUOT(s(minus(x'', y'')), s(y0)) -> QUOT(minus(x'', plus(y'', y0)), s(y0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

QUOT(s(minus(x'', s(x'))), s(y0')) -> QUOT(minus(x'', s(plus(x', y0'))), s(y0'))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 18

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 20

                 ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pairs:

QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))
QUOT(s(minus(x'', s(x'))), s(y0')) -> QUOT(minus(x'', s(plus(x', y0'))), s(y0'))
QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))
QUOT(s(s(minus(x', y'))), s(s(y'''))) -> QUOT(minus(x', plus(y', y''')), s(s(y''')))
QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

QUOT(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(x''''), s(0))
QUOT(s(s(minus(x'''', s(x'0')))), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(minus(x'''', s(x'0'))), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 18

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 21

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pairs:

QUOT(s(s(minus(x'''', s(x'0')))), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(minus(x'''', s(x'0'))), s(0))
QUOT(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(x''''), s(0))
QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))
QUOT(s(s(minus(x', y'))), s(s(y'''))) -> QUOT(minus(x', plus(y', y''')), s(s(y''')))
QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))
QUOT(s(minus(x'', s(x'))), s(y0')) -> QUOT(minus(x'', s(plus(x', y0'))), s(y0'))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

QUOT(s(s(minus(x'''', s(x'0')))), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(minus(x'''', s(x'0'))), s(0))
QUOT(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(x''''), s(0))
QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))
QUOT(s(s(minus(x', y'))), s(s(y'''))) -> QUOT(minus(x', plus(y', y''')), s(s(y''')))
QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))
QUOT(s(minus(x'', s(x'))), s(y0')) -> QUOT(minus(x'', s(plus(x', y0'))), s(y0'))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂

POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

POL(0) = 1

POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 18

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 22

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pair:

SUM(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

SUM(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

SUM(app(l, cons(x'', cons(y'', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(plus(x'', y''), k'))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 23

             ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pair:

SUM(app(l, cons(x'', cons(y'', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(plus(x'', y''), k'))))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

SUM(app(l, cons(x'', cons(y'', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(plus(x'', y''), k'))))

four new Dependency Pairs are created:

SUM(app(l, cons(x''', cons(y''', nil)))) -> SUM(app(l, cons(plus(x''', y'''), nil)))
SUM(app(l, cons(x''', cons(y''', cons(y', l''))))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(plus(plus(x''', y'''), y'), l''))))
SUM(app(l, cons(0, cons(y''', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(y''', k'))))
SUM(app(l, cons(s(x'), cons(y''', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(s(plus(x', y''')), k'))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 23

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 24

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

Dependency Pairs:

SUM(app(l, cons(s(x'), cons(y''', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(s(plus(x', y''')), k'))))
SUM(app(l, cons(0, cons(y''', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(y''', k'))))
SUM(app(l, cons(x''', cons(y''', cons(y', l''))))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(plus(plus(x''', y'''), y'), l''))))
SUM(app(l, cons(x''', cons(y''', nil)))) -> SUM(app(l, cons(plus(x''', y'''), nil)))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

SUM(app(l, cons(s(x'), cons(y''', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(s(plus(x', y''')), k'))))
SUM(app(l, cons(0, cons(y''', k')))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(y''', k'))))
SUM(app(l, cons(x''', cons(y''', cons(y', l''))))) -> SUM(app(l, sum(cons(plus(plus(x''', y'''), y'), l''))))
SUM(app(l, cons(x''', cons(y''', nil)))) -> SUM(app(l, cons(plus(x''', y'''), nil)))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 0

POL(0) = 0

POL(SUM(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂

POL(nil) = 0

POL(s(x₁)) = 0

POL(sum(x₁)) = 1

POL(app(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Polo

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 23

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 25

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z))
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
app(nil, k) -> k
app(l, nil) -> l
app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k))
sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil)
sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l))
sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k)))))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:02 minutes

POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁
POL(s(x₁))	= 1 + x₁

POL(cons(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₂
POL(APP(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁

POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁
POL(s(x₁))	= 1 + x₁

POL(plus(x₁, x₂))	= 0
POL(0)	= 0
POL(SUM(x₁))	= x₁
POL(cons(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₂
POL(s(x₁))	= 0

POL(plus(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₂
POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁
POL(0)	= 1
POL(minus(x₁, x₂))	= x₁
POL(s(x₁))	= 1 + x₁