Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x]
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

HALF(s(s(x))) -> HALF(x)
LASTBIT(s(s(x))) -> LASTBIT(x)
CONV(s(x)) -> CONV(half(s(x)))
CONV(s(x)) -> HALF(s(x))
CONV(s(x)) -> LASTBIT(s(x))

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

HALF(s(s(x))) -> HALF(x)

Rules:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

HALF(s(s(x))) -> HALF(x)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

HALF(x₁) -> HALF(x₁)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

LASTBIT(s(s(x))) -> LASTBIT(x)

Rules:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LASTBIT(s(s(x))) -> LASTBIT(x)

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS that need to be oriented.
Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

trivial

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

LASTBIT(x₁) -> LASTBIT(x₁)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

           →DP Problem 5

             ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

Dependency Pair:

CONV(s(x)) -> CONV(half(s(x)))

Rules:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

CONV(s(x)) -> CONV(half(s(x)))

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

CONV(s(0)) -> CONV(0)
CONV(s(s(x''))) -> CONV(s(half(x'')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 6

             ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering

Dependency Pair:

CONV(s(s(x''))) -> CONV(s(half(x'')))

Rules:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

CONV(s(s(x''))) -> CONV(s(half(x'')))

The following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the AFS can be oriented:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))

Used ordering: Lexicographic Path Order with Non-Strict Precedence with Quasi Precedence:

s > half

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:

CONV(x₁) -> CONV(x₁)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)
half(x₁) -> half(x₁)

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳AFS

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 6

             ↳AFS

...

               →DP Problem 7

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
lastbit(0) -> 0
lastbit(s(0)) -> s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
conv(0) -> cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes