Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, z]
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))
QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)
PLUS(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> PLUS(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
PLUS(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> PLUS(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

MINUS(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> MINUS(s(x''), s(y''))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 5

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MINUS(s(s(s(x''''))), s(s(s(y'''')))) -> MINUS(s(s(x'''')), s(s(y'''')))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 4

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 6

                 ↳Dependency Graph

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Narrowing Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUOT(s(x), s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x, y), s(y))

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))
QUOT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> QUOT(minus(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))

The transformation is resulting in two new DP problems:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUOT(s(x''), s(0)) -> QUOT(x'', s(0))

one new Dependency Pair is created:

QUOT(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(x''''), s(0))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 9

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(x''''), s(0))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

QUOT(s(s(x'''')), s(0)) -> QUOT(s(x''''), s(0))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

POL(0) = 0

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 12

                 ↳Dependency Graph

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Narrowing Transformation

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> QUOT(minus(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Narrowing SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

QUOT(s(s(x'')), s(s(y''))) -> QUOT(minus(x'', y''), s(s(y'')))

two new Dependency Pairs are created:

QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))
QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))

The transformation is resulting in two new DP problems:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 10

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

QUOT(s(s(x''')), s(s(0))) -> QUOT(x''', s(s(0)))

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

POL(0) = 0

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 8

             ↳Nar

...

               →DP Problem 11

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

Dependency Pair:

QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

QUOT(s(s(s(x'))), s(s(s(y')))) -> QUOT(minus(x', y'), s(s(s(y'))))

Additionally, the following usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS can be oriented:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂

POL(0) = 1

POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)

one new Dependency Pair is created:

PLUS(s(s(x'')), y'') -> PLUS(s(x''), y'')

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 15

             ↳Forward Instantiation Transformation

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(s(x'')), y'') -> PLUS(s(x''), y'')

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

On this DP problem, a Forward Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

PLUS(s(s(x'')), y'') -> PLUS(s(x''), y'')

one new Dependency Pair is created:

PLUS(s(s(s(x''''))), y'''') -> PLUS(s(s(x'''')), y'''')

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 15

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 16

                 ↳Polynomial Ordering

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(s(s(x''''))), y'''') -> PLUS(s(s(x'''')), y'''')

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

PLUS(s(s(s(x''''))), y'''') -> PLUS(s(s(x'''')), y'''')

There are no usable rules for innermost w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:

POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

resulting in one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳FwdInst

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Nar

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳FwdInst

           →DP Problem 15

             ↳FwdInst

...

               →DP Problem 17

                 ↳Dependency Graph

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) -> y
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
plus(plus(x, s(0)), plus(y, s(s(z)))) -> plus(plus(y, s(s(z))), plus(x, s(0)))

Strategy:

innermost

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes

POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁
POL(s(x₁))	= 1 + x₁

POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁
POL(0)	= 0
POL(s(x₁))	= 1 + x₁

POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(0)	= 1
POL(minus(x₁, x₂))	= x₁
POL(s(x₁))	= 1 + x₁

POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂))	= 1 + x₁
POL(s(x₁))	= 1 + x₁