Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
times(x, 0) -> 0
times(x, s(y)) -> plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) -> x
plus(0, x) -> x
plus(x, s(y)) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))

Innermost Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

TIMES(x, s(y)) -> PLUS(times(x, y), x)
TIMES(x, s(y)) -> TIMES(x, y)
PLUS(x, s(y)) -> PLUS(x, y)
PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳UsableRules`

Dependency Pairs:

PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)
PLUS(x, s(y)) -> PLUS(x, y)

Rules:

times(x, 0) -> 0
times(x, s(y)) -> plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) -> x
plus(0, x) -> x
plus(x, s(y)) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 6 non-usable-rules.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳UsableRules`
`           →DP Problem 3`
`             ↳Size-Change Principle`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳UsableRules`

Dependency Pairs:

PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)
PLUS(x, s(y)) -> PLUS(x, y)

Rule:

none

Strategy:

innermost

We number the DPs as follows:
1. PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)
2. PLUS(x, s(y)) -> PLUS(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2=2
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1=1
2>2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1=1
2>2
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2=2
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1
2>2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳UsableRules`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)`

Dependency Pair:

TIMES(x, s(y)) -> TIMES(x, y)

Rules:

times(x, 0) -> 0
times(x, s(y)) -> plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) -> x
plus(0, x) -> x
plus(x, s(y)) -> s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y))

Strategy:

innermost

As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 6 non-usable-rules.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳UsableRules`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳UsableRules`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Size-Change Principle`

Dependency Pair:

TIMES(x, s(y)) -> TIMES(x, y)

Rule:

none

Strategy:

innermost

We number the DPs as follows:
1. TIMES(x, s(y)) -> TIMES(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1=1
2>2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1=1
2>2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Innermost Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes