Term Rewriting System R: [x, y] g(c(x, s(y))) -> g(c(s(x), y)) f(c(s(x), y)) -> f(c(x, s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) f(x) -> x Termination of R to be shown. Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering: f(x) -> x where the Polynomial interpretation: POL(g(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 POL(d(x_1)) = x_1 POL(c(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 POL(f(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 was used. Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R. R contains the following Dependency Pairs: G(c(x, s(y))) -> G(c(s(x), y)) F(c(s(x), y)) -> F(c(x, s(y))) F(f(x)) -> F(d(f(x))) Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. SCC1: G(c(x, s(y))) -> G(c(s(x), y)) Removing rules from R by ordering and analyzing Dependency Pairs, Usable Rules, and Usable Equations. This is possible by using the following (C_E-compatible) Polynomial ordering. Polynomial interpretation: POL(G(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 POL(c(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 No Dependency Pairs can be deleted. The following rules of R can be deleted: g(c(x, s(y))) -> g(c(s(x), y)) f(c(s(x), y)) -> f(c(x, s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) This transformation is resulting in one new subcycle: SCC1.MRR1: G(c(x, s(y))) -> G(c(s(x), y)) Applying the non-overlappingness check to the DPs. The transformation is resulting in one subcycle: SCC1.MRR1.NOC1: G(c(x, s(y))) -> G(c(s(x), y)) By using a polynomial ordering, at least one Dependency Pair of this SCC can be strictly oriented. No rules need to be oriented. Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation: POL(G(x_1)) = x_1 POL(s(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(c(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_2 resulting in no subcycles. SCC2: F(c(s(x), y)) -> F(c(x, s(y))) Removing rules from R by ordering and analyzing Dependency Pairs, Usable Rules, and Usable Equations. This is possible by using the following (C_E-compatible) Polynomial ordering. Polynomial interpretation: POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 POL(F(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(c(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 No Dependency Pairs can be deleted. The following rules of R can be deleted: g(c(x, s(y))) -> g(c(s(x), y)) f(c(s(x), y)) -> f(c(x, s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) This transformation is resulting in one new subcycle: SCC2.MRR1: F(c(s(x), y)) -> F(c(x, s(y))) Applying the non-overlappingness check to the DPs. The transformation is resulting in one subcycle: SCC2.MRR1.NOC1: F(c(s(x), y)) -> F(c(x, s(y))) By using a polynomial ordering, at least one Dependency Pair of this SCC can be strictly oriented. No rules need to be oriented. Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation: POL(s(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(F(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(c(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 resulting in no subcycles. Termination of R successfully shown. Duration: 0.632 seconds.