Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x, xs, f]
app(app(plus, 0), y) -> y
app(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> app(s, app(app(plus, x), y))
app(inc, xs) -> app(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
app(app(map, f), nil) -> nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Overlay and local confluence Check



The TRS is overlay and locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence, we can switch to innermost. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(s, app(app(plus, x), y))
APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(app(plus, x), y)
APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(plus, x)
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(map, app(plus, app(s, 0)))
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(plus, app(s, 0))
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(s, 0)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(cons, app(f, x))
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(app(plus, x), y)


Rules:


app(app(plus, 0), y) -> y
app(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> app(s, app(app(plus, x), y))
app(inc, xs) -> app(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
app(app(map, f), nil) -> nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 5 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
             ...
               →DP Problem 3
                 ↳A-Transformation
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

APP(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> APP(app(plus, x), y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We have an applicative DP problem with proper arity. Thus we can use the A-Transformation to obtain one new DP problem which consists of the A-transformed TRSs.


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
             ...
               →DP Problem 4
                 ↳Size-Change Principle
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳UsableRules


Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. PLUS(s(x), y) -> PLUS(x, y)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1
2=2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳Usable Rules (Innermost)


Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)


Rules:


app(app(plus, 0), y) -> y
app(app(plus, app(s, x)), y) -> app(s, app(app(plus, x), y))
app(inc, xs) -> app(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
app(app(map, f), nil) -> nil
app(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> app(app(cons, app(f, x)), app(app(map, f), xs))


Strategy:

innermost




As we are in the innermost case, we can delete all 5 non-usable-rules.


   R
     ↳OC
       →TRS2
         ↳DPs
           →DP Problem 1
             ↳UsableRules
           →DP Problem 2
             ↳UsableRules
             ...
               →DP Problem 5
                 ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pairs:

APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)
APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
APP(inc, xs) -> APP(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)


Rule:

none


Strategy:

innermost




We number the DPs as follows:
  1. APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(app(map, f), xs)
  2. APP(app(map, f), app(app(cons, x), xs)) -> APP(f, x)
  3. APP(inc, xs) -> APP(app(map, app(plus, app(s, 0))), xs)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1=1
2>2
{2} , {2}
1>1
2>2
{3} , {3}
2=2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1=1
2>2
{2} , {2}
1>1
2>2
{3} , {2}
2>2
{1} , {2}
1>1
2>2
{2} , {1}
1>1
2>2
{2} , {3}
2>2
{1} , {1}
1>1
2>2
{1} , {3}
2>2
{2} , {2}
2>2
{2} , {1}
2>2
{1} , {1}
2>2
{1} , {2}
2>2

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
app(x1, x2) -> app(x1, x2)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes