Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Z, N, Y]
from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
PI(X) -> 2NDSPOS(X, from(0))
PI(X) -> FROM(0)
PLUS(s(X), Y) -> S(plus(X, Y))
PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(Y, times(X, Y))
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)
SQUARE(X) -> TIMES(X, X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> FROM(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> S(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Furthermore, R contains four SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

ACTIVATE(n_{_s}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n_{_from}(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{2, 1}	,	{2, 1}
1	>	1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{2, 1}	,	{2, 1}
1	>	1

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

n_{_from}(x₁) -> n_{_from}(x₁)
n_{_s}(x₁) -> n_{_s}(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	=	2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	=	2

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

Dependency Pairs:

2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1

{2}	,	{2}
1	=	1

{3}	,	{3}
1	>	1

{4}	,	{4}
1	=	1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{3}
1	>	1

{3}	,	{1}
1	>	1

{1}	,	{2}
1	>	1

{2}	,	{3}
1	>	1

{4}	,	{1}
1	>	1

{3}	,	{4}
1	>	1

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
cons2(x₁, x₂) -> cons2(x₁, x₂)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Size-Change Principle

Dependency Pair:

TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, n_{_from}(n_{_s}(X)))
from(X) -> n_{_from}(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
s(X) -> n_{_s}(X)
activate(n_{_from}(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(n_{_s}(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(X) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	=	2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	=	2

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:01 minutes