Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Z, Y, X1, X2]
from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
first(0, Z) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, nfirst(X, activate(Z)))
first(X1, X2) -> nfirst(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, Z)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> SEL(X, activate(Z))
SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> FROM(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> S(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> FIRST(activate(X1), activate(X2))
ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X2)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Negative Polynomial Order
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳SCP


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> FIRST(activate(X1), activate(X2))
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
first(0, Z) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, nfirst(X, activate(Z)))
first(X1, X2) -> nfirst(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, Z)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X





The following Dependency Pairs can be strictly oriented using the given order.

ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> FIRST(activate(X1), activate(X2))


Moreover, the following usable rules (regarding the implicit AFS) are oriented.

activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X
from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
s(X) -> ns(X)
first(0, Z) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, nfirst(X, activate(Z)))
first(X1, X2) -> nfirst(X1, X2)


Used ordering:
Polynomial Order with Interpretation:

POL( ACTIVATE(x1) ) = x1

POL( nfirst(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2 + 1

POL( FIRST(x1, x2) ) = x2

POL( activate(x1) ) = x1

POL( nfrom(x1) ) = x1

POL( ns(x1) ) = x1

POL( cons(x1, x2) ) = x2

POL( from(x1) ) = x1

POL( s(x1) ) = x1

POL( first(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2 + 1

POL( 0 ) = 0

POL( nil ) = 0


This results in one new DP problem. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Neg POLO
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Dependency Graph
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳SCP


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
first(0, Z) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, nfirst(X, activate(Z)))
first(X1, X2) -> nfirst(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, Z)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X





Using the Dependency Graph the DP problem was split into 1 DP problems.


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Neg POLO
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳DGraph
             ...
               →DP Problem 4
                 ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳SCP


Dependency Pairs:

ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
first(0, Z) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, nfirst(X, activate(Z)))
first(X1, X2) -> nfirst(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, Z)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X





We number the DPs as follows:
  1. ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
  2. ACTIVATE(ns(X)) -> ACTIVATE(X)
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1, 2} , {1, 2}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
nfrom(x1) -> nfrom(x1)
ns(x1) -> ns(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Neg POLO
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Size-Change Principle


Dependency Pair:

SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> SEL(X, activate(Z))


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(ns(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
first(0, Z) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, nfirst(X, activate(Z)))
first(X1, X2) -> nfirst(X1, X2)
sel(0, cons(X, Z)) -> X
sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z))
s(X) -> ns(X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(activate(X))
activate(ns(X)) -> s(activate(X))
activate(nfirst(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(X) -> X





We number the DPs as follows:
  1. SEL(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> SEL(X, activate(Z))
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
cons(x1, x2) -> cons(x1, x2)
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes