Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y]
rev(a) -> a
rev(b) -> b
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
rev(++(x, x)) -> rev(x)
Termination of R to be shown.
R
↳Removing Redundant Rules
Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:
rev(a) -> a
where the Polynomial interpretation:
POL(rev(x1)) | = 2·x1 |
POL(b) | = 0 |
POL(++(x1, x2)) | = x1 + x2 |
POL(a) | = 1 |
was used.
Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳Removing Redundant Rules
Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:
rev(++(x, y)) -> ++(rev(y), rev(x))
rev(++(x, x)) -> rev(x)
where the Polynomial interpretation:
POL(rev(x1)) | = 2·x1 |
POL(b) | = 0 |
POL(++(x1, x2)) | = 1 + x1 + x2 |
was used.
Not all Rules of R can be deleted, so we still have to regard a part of R.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳RRRPolo
→TRS3
↳Removing Redundant Rules
Removing the following rules from R which fullfill a polynomial ordering:
rev(b) -> b
where the Polynomial interpretation:
POL(rev(x1)) | = 1 + x1 |
POL(b) | = 0 |
was used.
All Rules of R can be deleted.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳RRRPolo
→TRS3
↳RRRPolo
...
→TRS4
↳Overlay and local confluence Check
The TRS is overlay and locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence, we can switch to innermost.
R
↳RRRPolo
→TRS2
↳RRRPolo
→TRS3
↳RRRPolo
...
→TRS5
↳Dependency Pair Analysis
R contains no Dependency Pairs and therefore no SCCs.
Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes