* Step 1: ToInnermost WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
        - Signature:
            {h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {h} and constructors {a,f}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
* Step 2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
        - Signature:
            {h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {h} and constructors {a,f}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 2.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          a_0() -> 2
          a_1() -> 5
          a_2() -> 9
          f_0(2,2) -> 2
          f_1(2,3) -> 1
          f_1(2,3) -> 6
          f_1(2,3) -> 10
          f_1(4,5) -> 3
          f_2(3,7) -> 4
          f_2(3,7) -> 8
          f_2(8,9) -> 7
          h_0(2) -> 1
          h_1(2) -> 6
          h_1(6) -> 4
          h_2(2) -> 10
          h_2(10) -> 8
* Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
        - Signature:
            {h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {h} and constructors {a,f}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))