* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
        - Signature:
            {h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {h} and constructors {a,f}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 2.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          a_0() -> 1
          a_1() -> 6
          a_2() -> 10
          f_0(1,1) -> 2
          f_0(1,2) -> 2
          f_0(2,1) -> 2
          f_0(2,2) -> 2
          f_1(1,4) -> 3
          f_1(1,4) -> 7
          f_1(1,4) -> 11
          f_1(2,4) -> 3
          f_1(2,4) -> 7
          f_1(2,4) -> 11
          f_1(5,6) -> 4
          f_2(4,8) -> 5
          f_2(4,8) -> 9
          f_2(9,10) -> 8
          h_0(1) -> 3
          h_0(2) -> 3
          h_1(1) -> 7
          h_1(2) -> 7
          h_1(7) -> 5
          h_2(1) -> 11
          h_2(2) -> 11
          h_2(11) -> 9
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
        - Signature:
            {h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {h} and constructors {a,f}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))