(0) Obligation:
Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(div(X1, X2)) → div(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
div(mark(X1), X2) → mark(div(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
proper(minus(X1, X2)) → minus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(geq(X1, X2)) → geq(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(div(X1, X2)) → div(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
minus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(minus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
geq(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(geq(X1, X2))
div(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(div(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n1):
The rewrite sequence
s(mark(X)) →+ mark(s(X))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
The pumping substitution is [X / mark(X)].
The result substitution is [ ].
(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)
(3) RenamingProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.
(4) Obligation:
Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
active(minus(0', Y)) → mark(0')
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0')) → mark(true)
active(geq(0', s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0', s(Y))) → mark(0')
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0'))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(div(X1, X2)) → div(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
div(mark(X1), X2) → mark(div(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
proper(minus(X1, X2)) → minus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0') → ok(0')
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(geq(X1, X2)) → geq(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(div(X1, X2)) → div(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
minus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(minus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
geq(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(geq(X1, X2))
div(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(div(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))
S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
(5) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
Infered types.
(6) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(minus(0', Y)) → mark(0')
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0')) → mark(true)
active(geq(0', s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0', s(Y))) → mark(0')
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0'))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(div(X1, X2)) → div(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
div(mark(X1), X2) → mark(div(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
proper(minus(X1, X2)) → minus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0') → ok(0')
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(geq(X1, X2)) → geq(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(div(X1, X2)) → div(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
minus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(minus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
geq(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(geq(X1, X2))
div(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(div(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
(7) OrderProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols:
active,
minus,
geq,
if,
s,
div,
proper,
topThey will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
minus < active
geq < active
if < active
s < active
div < active
active < top
minus < proper
geq < proper
if < proper
s < proper
div < proper
proper < top
(8) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
minus, active, geq, if, s, div, proper, top
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
minus < active
geq < active
if < active
s < active
div < active
active < top
minus < proper
geq < proper
if < proper
s < proper
div < proper
proper < top
(9) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol minus.
(10) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
geq, active, if, s, div, proper, top
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
geq < active
if < active
s < active
div < active
active < top
geq < proper
if < proper
s < proper
div < proper
proper < top
(11) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol geq.
(12) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
if, active, s, div, proper, top
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
if < active
s < active
div < active
active < top
if < proper
s < proper
div < proper
proper < top
(13) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Proved the following rewrite lemma:
if(
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(
+(
1,
n19_0)),
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(
b),
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(
c)) →
*4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n19
0)
Induction Base:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, 0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c))
Induction Step:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, +(n19_0, 1))), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) →RΩ(1)
mark(if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c))) →IH
mark(*4_0)
We have rt ∈ Ω(n1) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have ircR ∈ Ω(n).
(14) Complex Obligation (BEST)
(15) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
s, active, div, proper, top
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
s < active
div < active
active < top
s < proper
div < proper
proper < top
(16) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Proved the following rewrite lemma:
s(
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(
+(
1,
n1560_0))) →
*4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n1560
0)
Induction Base:
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, 0)))
Induction Step:
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, +(n1560_0, 1)))) →RΩ(1)
mark(s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0)))) →IH
mark(*4_0)
We have rt ∈ Ω(n1) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have ircR ∈ Ω(n).
(17) Complex Obligation (BEST)
(18) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0))) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n15600)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
div, active, proper, top
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
div < active
active < top
div < proper
proper < top
(19) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Proved the following rewrite lemma:
div(
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(
+(
1,
n2116_0)),
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(
b)) →
*4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n2116
0)
Induction Base:
div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, 0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b))
Induction Step:
div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, +(n2116_0, 1))), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b)) →RΩ(1)
mark(div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n2116_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b))) →IH
mark(*4_0)
We have rt ∈ Ω(n1) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have ircR ∈ Ω(n).
(20) Complex Obligation (BEST)
(21) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0))) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n15600)
div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n2116_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n21160)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
active, proper, top
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
active < top
proper < top
(22) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol active.
(23) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0))) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n15600)
div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n2116_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n21160)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
proper, top
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
proper < top
(24) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol proper.
(25) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0))) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n15600)
div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n2116_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n21160)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
top
(26) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol top.
(27) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0))) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n15600)
div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n2116_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n21160)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
No more defined symbols left to analyse.
(28) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The lowerbound Ω(n1) was proven with the following lemma:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
(29) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)
(30) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0))) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n15600)
div(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n2116_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n21160)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
No more defined symbols left to analyse.
(31) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The lowerbound Ω(n1) was proven with the following lemma:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
(32) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)
(33) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
s(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n1560_0))) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n15600)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
No more defined symbols left to analyse.
(34) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The lowerbound Ω(n1) was proven with the following lemma:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
(35) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)
(36) Obligation:
TRS:
Rules:
active(
minus(
0',
Y)) →
mark(
0')
active(
minus(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
minus(
X,
Y))
active(
geq(
X,
0')) →
mark(
true)
active(
geq(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
false)
active(
geq(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
geq(
X,
Y))
active(
div(
0',
s(
Y))) →
mark(
0')
active(
div(
s(
X),
s(
Y))) →
mark(
if(
geq(
X,
Y),
s(
div(
minus(
X,
Y),
s(
Y))),
0'))
active(
if(
true,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
X)
active(
if(
false,
X,
Y)) →
mark(
Y)
active(
s(
X)) →
s(
active(
X))
active(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
active(
X1),
X2)
active(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
active(
X1),
X2,
X3)
s(
mark(
X)) →
mark(
s(
X))
div(
mark(
X1),
X2) →
mark(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
mark(
X1),
X2,
X3) →
mark(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
proper(
minus(
X1,
X2)) →
minus(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
0') →
ok(
0')
proper(
s(
X)) →
s(
proper(
X))
proper(
geq(
X1,
X2)) →
geq(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
true) →
ok(
true)
proper(
false) →
ok(
false)
proper(
div(
X1,
X2)) →
div(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2))
proper(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3)) →
if(
proper(
X1),
proper(
X2),
proper(
X3))
minus(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
minus(
X1,
X2))
s(
ok(
X)) →
ok(
s(
X))
geq(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
geq(
X1,
X2))
div(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2)) →
ok(
div(
X1,
X2))
if(
ok(
X1),
ok(
X2),
ok(
X3)) →
ok(
if(
X1,
X2,
X3))
top(
mark(
X)) →
top(
proper(
X))
top(
ok(
X)) →
top(
active(
X))
Types:
active :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
minus :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
0' :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
mark :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
s :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
geq :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
true :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
false :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
div :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
if :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
proper :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
ok :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → 0':mark:true:false:ok
top :: 0':mark:true:false:ok → top
hole_0':mark:true:false:ok1_0 :: 0':mark:true:false:ok
hole_top2_0 :: top
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0 :: Nat → 0':mark:true:false:ok
Lemmas:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
Generator Equations:
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(x))
No more defined symbols left to analyse.
(37) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The lowerbound Ω(n1) was proven with the following lemma:
if(gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(+(1, n19_0)), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(b), gen_0':mark:true:false:ok3_0(c)) → *4_0, rt ∈ Ω(n190)
(38) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)