* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            active(b()) -> mark(c())
            f(ok(X1),ok(X2),ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1,X2,X3))
            g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
            g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
            proper(b()) -> ok(b())
            proper(c()) -> ok(c())
            top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
            top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))
        - Signature:
            {active/1,f/3,g/1,proper/1,top/1} / {b/0,c/0,mark/1,ok/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {active,f,g,proper,top} and constructors {b,c,mark,ok}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 5.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          active_0(2) -> 1
          active_1(2) -> 5
          active_2(3) -> 6
          active_3(7) -> 9
          active_3(8) -> 9
          active_4(10) -> 11
          active_5(12) -> 13
          b_0() -> 2
          b_1() -> 3
          b_2() -> 8
          c_0() -> 2
          c_1() -> 3
          c_2() -> 7
          c_3() -> 10
          c_4() -> 12
          f_0(2,2,2) -> 1
          f_1(2,2,2) -> 4
          g_0(2) -> 1
          g_1(2) -> 3
          mark_0(2) -> 2
          mark_1(3) -> 1
          mark_1(3) -> 3
          mark_1(3) -> 5
          mark_2(7) -> 6
          mark_3(10) -> 9
          ok_0(2) -> 2
          ok_1(3) -> 1
          ok_1(3) -> 3
          ok_1(3) -> 5
          ok_1(4) -> 1
          ok_1(4) -> 4
          ok_2(7) -> 6
          ok_2(8) -> 6
          ok_3(10) -> 9
          ok_4(12) -> 11
          proper_0(2) -> 1
          proper_1(2) -> 5
          proper_2(3) -> 6
          proper_3(7) -> 9
          proper_4(10) -> 11
          top_0(2) -> 1
          top_1(5) -> 1
          top_2(6) -> 1
          top_3(9) -> 1
          top_4(11) -> 1
          top_5(13) -> 1
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            active(b()) -> mark(c())
            f(ok(X1),ok(X2),ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1,X2,X3))
            g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X))
            g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X))
            proper(b()) -> ok(b())
            proper(c()) -> ok(c())
            top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
            top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))
        - Signature:
            {active/1,f/3,g/1,proper/1,top/1} / {b/0,c/0,mark/1,ok/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {active,f,g,proper,top} and constructors {b,c,mark,ok}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))