* Step 1: ToInnermost WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            a__c() -> c()
            a__c() -> d()
            a__g(X) -> a__h(X)
            a__g(X) -> g(X)
            a__h(X) -> h(X)
            a__h(d()) -> a__g(c())
            mark(c()) -> a__c()
            mark(d()) -> d()
            mark(g(X)) -> a__g(X)
            mark(h(X)) -> a__h(X)
        - Signature:
            {a__c/0,a__g/1,a__h/1,mark/1} / {c/0,d/0,g/1,h/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__c,a__g,a__h,mark} and constructors {c,d,g,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
* Step 2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            a__c() -> c()
            a__c() -> d()
            a__g(X) -> a__h(X)
            a__g(X) -> g(X)
            a__h(X) -> h(X)
            a__h(d()) -> a__g(c())
            mark(c()) -> a__c()
            mark(d()) -> d()
            mark(g(X)) -> a__g(X)
            mark(h(X)) -> a__h(X)
        - Signature:
            {a__c/0,a__g/1,a__h/1,mark/1} / {c/0,d/0,g/1,h/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__c,a__g,a__h,mark} and constructors {c,d,g,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 5.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          a__c_0() -> 1
          a__c_1() -> 1
          a__g_0(2) -> 1
          a__g_1(1) -> 1
          a__g_1(2) -> 1
          a__g_2(1) -> 1
          a__g_3(3) -> 1
          a__h_0(2) -> 1
          a__h_1(2) -> 1
          a__h_2(1) -> 1
          a__h_2(2) -> 1
          a__h_3(1) -> 1
          a__h_4(3) -> 1
          c_0() -> 2
          c_1() -> 1
          c_2() -> 1
          c_3() -> 3
          d_0() -> 2
          d_1() -> 1
          d_2() -> 1
          g_0(2) -> 2
          g_1(2) -> 1
          g_2(1) -> 1
          g_2(2) -> 1
          g_3(1) -> 1
          g_4(3) -> 1
          h_0(2) -> 2
          h_1(2) -> 1
          h_2(2) -> 1
          h_3(1) -> 1
          h_3(2) -> 1
          h_4(1) -> 1
          h_5(3) -> 1
          mark_0(2) -> 1
* Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            a__c() -> c()
            a__c() -> d()
            a__g(X) -> a__h(X)
            a__g(X) -> g(X)
            a__h(X) -> h(X)
            a__h(d()) -> a__g(c())
            mark(c()) -> a__c()
            mark(d()) -> d()
            mark(g(X)) -> a__g(X)
            mark(h(X)) -> a__h(X)
        - Signature:
            {a__c/0,a__g/1,a__h/1,mark/1} / {c/0,d/0,g/1,h/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__c,a__g,a__h,mark} and constructors {c,d,g,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))