* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y)))
            g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y))
            g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x))
        - Signature:
            {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          c_0(2,2) -> 2
          c_1(2,4) -> 3
          c_1(4,2) -> 5
          f_0(2) -> 1
          f_1(3) -> 1
          g_0(2) -> 1
          g_1(5) -> 1
          s_0(2) -> 2
          s_1(2) -> 4
          s_1(4) -> 4
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y)))
            g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y))
            g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x))
        - Signature:
            {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))