* Step 1: ToInnermost WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)
            g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
            g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
        - Signature:
            {g/2} / {f/2,h/2}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {g} and constructors {f,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
* Step 2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)
            g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
            g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
        - Signature:
            {g/2} / {f/2,h/2}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {g} and constructors {f,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          f_0(2,2) -> 2
          f_1(2,2) -> 4
          f_1(2,3) -> 1
          f_1(2,3) -> 3
          f_1(2,4) -> 4
          g_0(2,2) -> 1
          g_1(2,2) -> 3
          g_1(2,4) -> 1
          g_1(2,4) -> 3
          h_0(2,2) -> 2
          h_1(3,2) -> 1
          h_1(3,2) -> 3
* Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)
            g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
            g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
        - Signature:
            {g/2} / {f/2,h/2}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {g} and constructors {f,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))