* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(x,g(x)) -> x
            f(x,h(y)) -> f(h(x),y)
        - Signature:
            {f/2} / {g/1,h/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          f_0(2,2) -> 1
          f_0(2,3) -> 1
          f_0(3,2) -> 1
          f_0(3,3) -> 1
          f_1(4,2) -> 1
          f_1(4,3) -> 1
          g_0(2) -> 1
          g_0(2) -> 2
          g_0(3) -> 1
          g_0(3) -> 2
          h_0(2) -> 1
          h_0(2) -> 3
          h_0(3) -> 1
          h_0(3) -> 3
          h_1(2) -> 1
          h_1(2) -> 4
          h_1(3) -> 1
          h_1(3) -> 4
          h_1(4) -> 1
          h_1(4) -> 4
          2 -> 1
          3 -> 1
          4 -> 1
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(x,g(x)) -> x
            f(x,h(y)) -> f(h(x),y)
        - Signature:
            {f/2} / {g/1,h/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g,h}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))