* Step 1: ToInnermost WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,a()) -> x f(x,g(y)) -> f(g(x),y) - Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,g/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {a,g} + Applied Processor: ToInnermost + Details: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules * Step 2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,a()) -> x f(x,g(y)) -> f(g(x),y) - Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {a,g} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a_0() -> 1 a_0() -> 2 f_0(1,1) -> 2 f_0(1,3) -> 2 f_0(3,1) -> 2 f_0(3,3) -> 2 f_1(4,1) -> 2 f_1(4,3) -> 2 g_0(1) -> 2 g_0(1) -> 3 g_0(3) -> 2 g_0(3) -> 3 g_1(1) -> 2 g_1(1) -> 4 g_1(3) -> 2 g_1(3) -> 4 g_1(4) -> 2 g_1(4) -> 4 1 -> 2 3 -> 2 4 -> 2 * Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(x,a()) -> x f(x,g(y)) -> f(g(x),y) - Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {a,g} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))