* Step 1: ToInnermost WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x)))
        - Signature:
            {a/1} / {b/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a} and constructors {b}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
* Step 2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x)))
        - Signature:
            {a/1} / {b/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a} and constructors {b}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          a_0(2) -> 1
          a_1(2) -> 4
          b_0(2) -> 2
          b_1(3) -> 1
          b_1(3) -> 4
          b_1(4) -> 3
* Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x)))
        - Signature:
            {a/1} / {b/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a} and constructors {b}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))