```* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
minus(f(x,y)) -> f(minus(y),minus(x))
minus(h(x)) -> h(minus(x))
- Signature:
{minus/1} / {f/2,h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {minus} and constructors {f,h}
+ Applied Processor:
Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
+ Details:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
f_0(2,2) -> 2
f_1(3,4) -> 1
f_1(4,4) -> 3
f_1(4,4) -> 4
h_0(2) -> 2
h_1(4) -> 1
h_1(4) -> 3
h_1(4) -> 4
minus_0(2) -> 1
minus_1(2) -> 3
minus_1(2) -> 4
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Weak TRS:
minus(f(x,y)) -> f(minus(y),minus(x))
minus(h(x)) -> h(minus(x))
- Signature:
{minus/1} / {f/2,h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {minus} and constructors {f,h}
+ Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
+ Details:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
```