* Step 1: MI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            g(f(x),y) -> f(h(x,y))
            h(x,y) -> g(x,f(y))
        - Signature:
            {g/2,h/2} / {f/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {g,h} and constructors {f}
    + Applied Processor:
        MI {miKind = MaximalMatrix (UpperTriangular (Multiplicity Nothing)), miDimension = 1, miUArgs = UArgs, miURules = URules, miSelector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind MaximalMatrix (UpperTriangular (Multiplicity Nothing)):
        
        The following argument positions are considered usable:
          uargs(f) = {1}
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          {g,h}
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(f) = [1] x_1 + [12]
          p(g) = [2] x_1 + [0] 
          p(h) = [2] x_1 + [1] 
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        g(f(x),y) = [2] x + [24]
                  > [2] x + [13]
                  = f(h(x,y))   
        
           h(x,y) = [2] x + [1] 
                  > [2] x + [0] 
                  = g(x,f(y))   
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            g(f(x),y) -> f(h(x,y))
            h(x,y) -> g(x,f(y))
        - Signature:
            {g/2,h/2} / {f/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {g,h} and constructors {f}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))