```* Step 1: WeightGap WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
le(0(),y) -> true()
le(s(x),0()) -> false()
le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
minus(x,0()) -> x
minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
mod(0(),y) -> 0()
mod(s(x),0()) -> 0()
mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
- Signature:
{if_mod/3,le/2,minus/2,mod/2} / {0/0,false/0,s/1,true/0}
- Obligation:
runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {if_mod,le,minus,mod} and constructors {0,false,s,true}
+ Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
+ Details:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(if_mod) = {1},
uargs(mod) = {1}

Following symbols are considered usable:
all
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(0) = [0]
p(false) = [0]
p(if_mod) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] x3 + [0]
p(le) = [11]
p(minus) = [1] x1 + [1]
p(mod) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1]
p(s) = [1] x1 + [8]
p(true) = [0]

Following rules are strictly oriented:
if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) = [1] x + [1] y + [16]
> [1] x + [8]
= s(x)

if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) = [1] x + [1] y + [16]
> [1] x + [1] y + [10]
= mod(minus(x,y),s(y))

le(0(),y) = [11]
> [0]
= true()

le(s(x),0()) = [11]
> [0]
= false()

minus(x,0()) = [1] x + [1]
> [1] x + [0]
= x

minus(s(x),s(y)) = [1] x + [9]
> [1] x + [1]
= minus(x,y)

mod(0(),y) = [1] y + [1]
> [0]
= 0()

mod(s(x),0()) = [1] x + [9]
> [0]
= 0()

Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
le(s(x),s(y)) =  [11]
>= [11]
=  le(x,y)

mod(s(x),s(y)) =  [1] x + [1] y + [17]
>= [1] x + [1] y + [27]
=  if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))

Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
* Step 2: WeightGap WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
- Weak TRS:
if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
le(0(),y) -> true()
le(s(x),0()) -> false()
minus(x,0()) -> x
minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
mod(0(),y) -> 0()
mod(s(x),0()) -> 0()
- Signature:
{if_mod/3,le/2,minus/2,mod/2} / {0/0,false/0,s/1,true/0}
- Obligation:
runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {if_mod,le,minus,mod} and constructors {0,false,s,true}
+ Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
+ Details:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(if_mod) = {1},
uargs(mod) = {1}

Following symbols are considered usable:
all
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(0) = [4]
p(false) = [0]
p(if_mod) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(le) = [0]
p(minus) = [1] x1 + [1]
p(mod) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(s) = [1] x1 + [4]
p(true) = [0]

Following rules are strictly oriented:
mod(s(x),s(y)) = [1] x + [6]
> [1] x + [4]
= if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))

Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) =  [1] x + [4]
>= [1] x + [4]
=  s(x)

if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) =  [1] x + [4]
>= [1] x + [3]
=  mod(minus(x,y),s(y))

le(0(),y) =  [0]
>= [0]
=  true()

le(s(x),0()) =  [0]
>= [0]
=  false()

le(s(x),s(y)) =  [0]
>= [0]
=  le(x,y)

minus(x,0()) =  [1] x + [1]
>= [1] x + [0]
=  x

minus(s(x),s(y)) =  [1] x + [5]
>= [1] x + [1]
=  minus(x,y)

mod(0(),y) =  [6]
>= [4]
=  0()

mod(s(x),0()) =  [1] x + [6]
>= [4]
=  0()

Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
* Step 3: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
- Weak TRS:
if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
le(0(),y) -> true()
le(s(x),0()) -> false()
minus(x,0()) -> x
minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
mod(0(),y) -> 0()
mod(s(x),0()) -> 0()
mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
- Signature:
{if_mod/3,le/2,minus/2,mod/2} / {0/0,false/0,s/1,true/0}
- Obligation:
runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {if_mod,le,minus,mod} and constructors {0,false,s,true}
+ Applied Processor:
NaturalPI {shape = Mixed 2, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
+ Details:
We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(mixed(2)):
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(if_mod) = {1},
uargs(mod) = {1}

Following symbols are considered usable:
all
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(0) = 0
p(false) = 0
p(if_mod) = 2*x1 + 6*x2*x3 + 2*x2^2
p(le) = x1 + 2*x2
p(minus) = x1
p(mod) = 4*x1 + 6*x1*x2 + 2*x1^2 + 2*x2
p(s) = 1 + x1
p(true) = 0

Following rules are strictly oriented:
le(s(x),s(y)) = 3 + x + 2*y
> x + 2*y
= le(x,y)

Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) =  8 + 10*x + 6*x*y + 2*x^2 + 6*y
>= 1 + x
=  s(x)

if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) =  8 + 10*x + 6*x*y + 2*x^2 + 6*y
>= 2 + 10*x + 6*x*y + 2*x^2 + 2*y
=  mod(minus(x,y),s(y))

le(0(),y) =  2*y
>= 0
=  true()

le(s(x),0()) =  1 + x
>= 0
=  false()

minus(x,0()) =  x
>= x
=  x

minus(s(x),s(y)) =  1 + x
>= x
=  minus(x,y)

mod(0(),y) =  2*y
>= 0
=  0()

mod(s(x),0()) =  6 + 8*x + 2*x^2
>= 0
=  0()

mod(s(x),s(y)) =  14 + 14*x + 6*x*y + 2*x^2 + 8*y
>= 8 + 14*x + 6*x*y + 2*x^2 + 8*y
=  if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))

* Step 4: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Weak TRS:
if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
le(0(),y) -> true()
le(s(x),0()) -> false()
le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
minus(x,0()) -> x
minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
mod(0(),y) -> 0()
mod(s(x),0()) -> 0()
mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
- Signature:
{if_mod/3,le/2,minus/2,mod/2} / {0/0,false/0,s/1,true/0}
- Obligation:
runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {if_mod,le,minus,mod} and constructors {0,false,s,true}
+ Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
+ Details:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
```