* Step 1: ToInnermost WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(0()) -> s(0())
            f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x)))
            g(0()) -> 0()
            g(s(x)) -> f(x)
        - Signature:
            {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
* Step 2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(0()) -> s(0())
            f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x)))
            g(0()) -> 0()
            g(s(x)) -> f(x)
        - Signature:
            {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          0_0() -> 2
          0_1() -> 1
          0_1() -> 3
          0_1() -> 4
          f_0(2) -> 1
          f_1(2) -> 1
          f_1(2) -> 4
          g_0(2) -> 1
          g_1(2) -> 4
          s_0(2) -> 2
          s_1(3) -> 1
          s_1(4) -> 3
          s_1(4) -> 4
* Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(0()) -> s(0())
            f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x)))
            g(0()) -> 0()
            g(s(x)) -> f(x)
        - Signature:
            {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))