(0) Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given
CpxTRS could be proven to be
BOUNDS(1, n^1).
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(0)) → s(0)
f(s(s(x))) → f(f(s(x)))
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
(1) RcToIrcProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
Converted rc-obligation to irc-obligation.
As the TRS is a non-duplicating overlay system, we have rc = irc.
(2) Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given
CpxTRS could be proven to be
BOUNDS(1, n^1).
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0) → s(0)
f(s(0)) → s(0)
f(s(s(x))) → f(f(s(x)))
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
(3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 2.
The certificate found is represented by the following graph.
Start state: 2
Accept states: [3]
Transitions:
2→3[f_1|0]
2→4[s_1|1]
2→5[f_1|1]
2→8[s_1|2]
3→3[0|0, s_1|0]
4→3[0|1]
5→6[f_1|1]
5→7[s_1|1]
5→5[f_1|1]
5→8[s_1|2]
6→3[s_1|1]
7→3[0|1]
8→3[0|2]
(4) BOUNDS(1, n^1)