Techniques used in AProVE 2012
In the following, we list all techniques that are used
for complexity analysis in AProVE 2012. By clicking on the name
of the technique, one can see a list of those examples in 
our evaluation where the respective technique was used.
- 
reduction pair processor
 This is the reduction pair processor combined with the usable 
rule processor. Here, we use reduction pairs based on 
polynomial interpretations.
- 
leaf removal processor
 This processor is based on the dependency graph and removes DTs that correspond to leaves of the graph.
- 
unreachable DT removal processor
 This processor removes DTs that cannot be reached from basic terms.
- 
rhs simplification processor
 This processor simplifies non-leaf DTs by removing subterms from their right-hand side.
More precisely, if s → COMn(t1, ..., tn ) is a DT where ti never
gives rise to edges in chain trees, then ti can be removed from the right-hand side COMn (t1 ,
..., tn).
- 
narrowing processor
 This processor replaces DTs by their narrowings.
- 
knowledge propagation processor
 This processor benefits from situations where we have already investigated the complexity of all predecessors of a DT.
- 
forward instantiation processor
 Similar to the narrowing processor, this processor adapts the
"forward instantiation" processor from the DP framework for complexity
analysis.
- 
match-bounds
 On SRSs, the match-bound
technique is often the technique of
choice to analyze termination and complexity. Therefore,
we also implemented this technique in AProVE (for both SRSs and TRSs).
- 
instantiation processor
 Similar to the narrowing processor, this processor adapts the
"instantiation" processor from the DP framework for complexity
analysis.
-  
rewriting processor
 Similar to the narrowing processor, this processor adapts the
"rewriting" processor from the DP framework for complexity
analysis.