We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ f(x, 0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))
, g(0(), x) -> g(f(x, x), x)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ f(x, 0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))
, g(0(), x) -> g(f(x, x), x)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies, where following rules are oriented strictly:
TRS Component: {g(0(), x) -> g(f(x, x), x)}
Interpretation of nonconstant growth:
-------------------------------------
The following argument positions are usable:
Uargs(f) = {}, Uargs(s) = {1}, Uargs(g) = {1}
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(1)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0 0] x1 + [0 0] x2 + [1]
[0 0] [0 0] [1]
0() = [0]
[2]
s(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [1]
[0 0] [1]
g(x1, x2) = [1 2] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 0] [1]
The strictly oriented rules are moved into the weak component.
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ f(x, 0()) -> s(0())
, f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs: {g(0(), x) -> g(f(x, x), x)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies, where following rules are oriented strictly:
TRS Component: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
Interpretation of nonconstant growth:
-------------------------------------
The following argument positions are usable:
Uargs(f) = {}, Uargs(s) = {1}, Uargs(g) = {1}
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(1)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0 0] x1 + [0 0] x2 + [1]
[0 0] [0 0] [0]
0() = [0]
[2]
s(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [0]
[0 0] [0]
g(x1, x2) = [1 2] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 0] [0 0] [1]
The strictly oriented rules are moved into the weak component.
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs:
{ f(x, 0()) -> s(0())
, g(0(), x) -> g(f(x, x), x)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs:
{ f(x, 0()) -> s(0())
, g(0(), x) -> g(f(x, x), x)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We have computed the following dependency pairs
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Weak DPs:
{ f^#(x, 0()) -> c_2()
, g^#(0(), x) -> g^#(f(x, x), x)}
We consider the following Problem:
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak DPs:
{ f^#(x, 0()) -> c_2()
, g^#(0(), x) -> g^#(f(x, x), x)}
Weak Trs:
{ f(x, 0()) -> s(0())
, g(0(), x) -> g(f(x, x), x)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We replace strict/weak-rules by the corresponding usable rules:
Strict Usable Rules: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Usable Rules: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
We consider the following Problem:
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak DPs:
{ f^#(x, 0()) -> c_2()
, g^#(0(), x) -> g^#(f(x, x), x)}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak DPs:
{ f^#(x, 0()) -> c_2()
, g^#(0(), x) -> g^#(f(x, x), x)}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We use following congruence DG for path analysis
->2:{1} [ YES(?,O(n^1)) ]
|
`->3:{2} [ YES(O(1),O(1)) ]
->1:{3} [ YES(O(1),O(1)) ]
Here dependency-pairs are as follows:
Strict DPs:
{1: f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
WeakDPs DPs:
{ 2: f^#(x, 0()) -> c_2()
, 3: g^#(0(), x) -> g^#(f(x, x), x)}
* Path 2:{1}: YES(?,O(n^1))
-------------------------
We consider the following Problem:
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
No rule is usable.
We consider the following Problem:
Strict DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ s_0(2) -> 2
, f^#_0(2, 2) -> 1
, f^#_1(2, 2) -> 1}
* Path 2:{1}->3:{2}: YES(O(1),O(1))
---------------------------------
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
No rule is usable.
We consider the following Problem:
Weak DPs: {f^#(s(x), s(y)) -> f^#(x, y)}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
Empty rules are trivially bounded
* Path 1:{3}: YES(O(1),O(1))
--------------------------
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {f(s(x), s(y)) -> s(f(x, y))}
Weak Trs: {f(x, 0()) -> s(0())}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
No rule is usable.
We consider the following Problem:
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(O(1),O(1))
Proof:
Empty rules are trivially bounded
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))