We consider the following Problem: Strict Trs: { plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z)) , times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))} StartTerms: basic terms Strategy: innermost Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1)) Proof: We consider the following Problem: Strict Trs: { plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z)) , times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))} StartTerms: basic terms Strategy: innermost Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1)) Proof: The weightgap principle applies, where following rules are oriented strictly: TRS Component: {times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))} Interpretation of nonconstant growth: ------------------------------------- The following argument positions are usable: Uargs(plus) = {2}, Uargs(times) = {}, Uargs(s) = {} We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(1)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation: Interpretation Functions: plus(x1, x2) = [0 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0] [0 1] [0 0] [0] times(x1, x2) = [0 1] x1 + [0 1] x2 + [1] [0 1] [0 0] [1] s(x1) = [0 0] x1 + [0] [0 1] [3] The strictly oriented rules are moved into the weak component. We consider the following Problem: Strict Trs: {plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z))} Weak Trs: {times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))} StartTerms: basic terms Strategy: innermost Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1)) Proof: We consider the following Problem: Strict Trs: {plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z))} Weak Trs: {times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))} StartTerms: basic terms Strategy: innermost Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1)) Proof: The following argument positions are usable: Uargs(plus) = {2}, Uargs(times) = {}, Uargs(s) = {} We have the following constructor-based EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(1)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation: Interpretation Functions: plus(x1, x2) = [3 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1] [0 0] [0 1] [0] times(x1, x2) = [3 3] x1 + [0 3] x2 + [0] [1 1] [1 1] [0] s(x1) = [0 0] x1 + [0] [1 1] [1] Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))