The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(O(1), O(n^2)).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
pred(s(x)) → x
minus(x, 0) → x
minus(x, s(y)) → pred(minus(x, y))
gcd(0, y) → y
gcd(s(x), 0) → s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) → if_gcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
if_gcd(true, s(x), s(y)) → gcd(minus(x, y), s(y))
if_gcd(false, s(x), s(y)) → gcd(minus(y, x), s(x))

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST

(1) CpxTrsToCdtProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Converted CpxTRS to CDT

(2) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

le(0, z0) → true
le(s(z0), 0) → false
le(s(z0), s(z1)) → le(z0, z1)
pred(s(z0)) → z0
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
gcd(0, z0) → z0
gcd(s(z0), 0) → s(z0)
gcd(s(z0), s(z1)) → if_gcd(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1))
if_gcd(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z0, z1), s(z1))
if_gcd(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z1, z0), s(z0))

Tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

S tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

le, pred, minus, gcd, if_gcd

Defined Pair Symbols:

LE, MINUS, GCD, IF_GCD

Compound Symbols:

c2, c5, c8, c9, c10

(3) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)

Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.

GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

We considered the (Usable) Rules:

minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
pred(s(z0)) → z0
le(0, z0) → true
le(s(z0), 0) → false
le(s(z0), s(z1)) → le(z0, z1)

And the Tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :

POL(0) = [3]   
POL(GCD(x₁, x₂)) = [2] + [3]x₁ + [3]x₂   
POL(IF_GCD(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = [3]x₂ + [3]x₃   
POL(LE(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = [5]   
POL(PRED(x₁)) = 0   
POL(c10(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c2(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(c5(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c8(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c9(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(le(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁   
POL(pred(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(s(x₁)) = [3] + x₁   
POL(true) = 0   

(4) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

le(0, z0) → true
le(s(z0), 0) → false
le(s(z0), s(z1)) → le(z0, z1)
pred(s(z0)) → z0
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
gcd(0, z0) → z0
gcd(s(z0), 0) → s(z0)
gcd(s(z0), s(z1)) → if_gcd(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1))
if_gcd(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z0, z1), s(z1))
if_gcd(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z1, z0), s(z0))

Tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

S tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

K tuples:

GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

Defined Rule Symbols:

le, pred, minus, gcd, if_gcd

Defined Pair Symbols:

LE, MINUS, GCD, IF_GCD

Compound Symbols:

c2, c5, c8, c9, c10

(5) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^2))) transformation)

Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.

MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

We considered the (Usable) Rules:

minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
pred(s(z0)) → z0
le(0, z0) → true
le(s(z0), 0) → false
le(s(z0), s(z1)) → le(z0, z1)

And the Tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :

POL(0) = 0   
POL(GCD(x₁, x₂)) = [2]x₁·x₂   
POL(IF_GCD(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = [2]x₂·x₃   
POL(LE(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = [3] + x₂   
POL(PRED(x₁)) = 0   
POL(c10(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c2(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(c5(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c8(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c9(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(le(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁   
POL(pred(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(s(x₁)) = [2] + x₁   
POL(true) = 0   

(6) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

le(0, z0) → true
le(s(z0), 0) → false
le(s(z0), s(z1)) → le(z0, z1)
pred(s(z0)) → z0
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
gcd(0, z0) → z0
gcd(s(z0), 0) → s(z0)
gcd(s(z0), s(z1)) → if_gcd(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1))
if_gcd(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z0, z1), s(z1))
if_gcd(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z1, z0), s(z0))

Tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

S tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))

K tuples:

GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

Defined Rule Symbols:

le, pred, minus, gcd, if_gcd

Defined Pair Symbols:

LE, MINUS, GCD, IF_GCD

Compound Symbols:

c2, c5, c8, c9, c10

(7) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^2))) transformation)

Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))

We considered the (Usable) Rules:

minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
pred(s(z0)) → z0
le(0, z0) → true
le(s(z0), 0) → false
le(s(z0), s(z1)) → le(z0, z1)

And the Tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :

POL(0) = 0   
POL(GCD(x₁, x₂)) = x₂ + [2]x₁·x₂   
POL(IF_GCD(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = [2]x₂·x₃   
POL(LE(x₁, x₂)) = [2] + x₁   
POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = x₂   
POL(PRED(x₁)) = [1]   
POL(c10(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c2(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(c5(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c8(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(c9(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(le(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁   
POL(pred(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(s(x₁)) = [2] + x₁   
POL(true) = 0   

(8) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

le(0, z0) → true
le(s(z0), 0) → false
le(s(z0), s(z1)) → le(z0, z1)
pred(s(z0)) → z0
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
gcd(0, z0) → z0
gcd(s(z0), 0) → s(z0)
gcd(s(z0), s(z1)) → if_gcd(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1))
if_gcd(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z0, z1), s(z1))
if_gcd(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → gcd(minus(z1, z0), s(z0))

Tuples:

LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))

S tuples:none
K tuples:

GCD(s(z0), s(z1)) → c8(IF_GCD(le(z1, z0), s(z0), s(z1)), LE(z1, z0))
IF_GCD(true, s(z0), s(z1)) → c9(GCD(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
IF_GCD(false, s(z0), s(z1)) → c10(GCD(minus(z1, z0), s(z0)), MINUS(z1, z0))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c5(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
LE(s(z0), s(z1)) → c2(LE(z0, z1))

Defined Rule Symbols:

le, pred, minus, gcd, if_gcd

Defined Pair Symbols:

LE, MINUS, GCD, IF_GCD

Compound Symbols:

c2, c5, c8, c9, c10

(9) SIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The set S is empty

(10) BOUNDS(O(1), O(1))