We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z))
, times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs:
{ plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z))
, times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies, where following rules are oriented strictly:
TRS Component: {times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))}
Interpretation of nonconstant growth:
-------------------------------------
The following argument positions are usable:
Uargs(plus) = {2}, Uargs(times) = {}, Uargs(s) = {}
We have the following EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(1)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
plus(x1, x2) = [0 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0]
[0 1] [0 0] [0]
times(x1, x2) = [0 1] x1 + [0 1] x2 + [1]
[0 1] [0 0] [1]
s(x1) = [0 0] x1 + [0]
[0 1] [3]
The strictly oriented rules are moved into the weak component.
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z))}
Weak Trs: {times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
We consider the following Problem:
Strict Trs: {plus(plus(X, Y), Z) -> plus(X, plus(Y, Z))}
Weak Trs: {times(X, s(Y)) -> plus(X, times(Y, X))}
StartTerms: basic terms
Strategy: innermost
Certificate: YES(?,O(n^1))
Proof:
The following argument positions are usable:
Uargs(plus) = {2}, Uargs(times) = {}, Uargs(s) = {}
We have the following constructor-based EDA-non-satisfying and IDA(1)-non-satisfying matrix interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
plus(x1, x2) = [3 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1]
[0 0] [0 1] [0]
times(x1, x2) = [3 3] x1 + [0 3] x2 + [0]
[1 1] [1 1] [0]
s(x1) = [0 0] x1 + [0]
[1 1] [1]
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))